Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75968 
Subject: Re: WSJ analysis of ICE
Date: 01/12/26 4:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Why on earth would any responsible politician want to keep known criminal aliens circulating in their neighborhoods?

They might not - and certainly not for dangerous criminals, rather than someone who gets clipped for a very minor offense. But again, this is the same issue I was discussing with LM in the other thread. The detainer policy has consequences for people who aren't criminals as well as criminals. Because detainer requests are not necessarily limited to people who have been convicted. So some responsible politicians object to the impact on the latter group, the consequence of deportation on the subset of people who are arrested for minor crimes, and the impact on law enforcement generally when this happens.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds