Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: bighairymike ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 86269 
Subject: Re: Politico Pro
Date: 02/08/25 10:29 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Turns out Speaker of the House Mike Johnson had a subscription to Politico Pro, as did most members oh the House and Senate- including one particular Representative who actually tweeted about the graft revealed in all of those Politico Pro subscriptions- Lauren Bobert.

And who paid for Lauren’s subscription?? USAID. - Bill


US Taxpayers should nut be paying for anyone's subscription to Politico.

=========================

A political database, that’s what it is. =Reporters also subscribe to it- on their own dime. - Bill

If reporters are paying for subscriptions with their own money, that is no problem. Since they pay privately, then their payment would not show in the US Treasury's payment system, so how do you some reporters even have a subscription?

=================

Tempest in a teapot. - Bill

As much as you would like for the sunshine to go away, the fact that some Republicans also have US taxpayers pay for their subscription does not make it OK.

In general, "The your guy did it too or did it worse" is just an attempt to shut down the debate, when instead the dialogue should be around how best to stop the waste, regardless of the party affiliation of the perpetrator(s).

No doubt, DOGE will turn up bad decision making and wasteful spending by Republicans too, maybe even more than Democrats.. I have no problem with that. Waste is waste and needs to stop rather than bending to the dem argument of "It's OK because your guy did it too."

Stopping as much waste as possible, irrespective of which party sponsored it, is just one example of the common sense found on main street and expressed in the 2024 election.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to bighairymike here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community