Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86281 
Subject: Re: King Schumer Caves
Date: 11/07/25 4:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
So you've gone all this time with many many posts attempting to analyze the situation--yet only NOW you claim

you had NO IDEA what the Democrats actually wanted?


No. I know what they wanted. They wanted an extension of ACA subsidies.

What I don't know is why you believe there was a $1.5 trillion demand out there. To my knowledge, neither Schumer nor leadership has ever said - but somehow, you've been sufficiently convinced that they wanted a $1.5 trillion bill to be passed. Enough that you think Schumer is an "azzhat" for proposing something that isn't anywhere near that large. I'd like to know why you think that the $1.5 trillion proposal is what Democrats were actually trying to hold out for. It's not what Schumer, or anyone from leadership, has ever proposed to my knowledge - which makes sense, because $1.5 trillion is close to 2x what even the Inflation Reduction Act cost, and that barely got past the Democrats. So it beggars belief that Democratic leadership would ever be holding out for something that big.

But you believed it, enough to confidently proclaim that Schumer had "caved" for merely settling for what I (and most Democrats, I think) understood was the Democratic position - an ACA subsidy extension. So I would like to know what proposal led you to believe that the number was really $1.5 trillion, rather than the much more reasonable proposal that (again) Democrats have been asking for this whole time.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community