Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: PucksFool 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 55803 
Subject: Re: Healthcare Costs Going Way Up,
Date: 09/08/2025 7:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
It's not a feature ad. The purpose of Social Security isn't limited to making sure that you only have enough money to avoid poverty in your old age. It's not an individually-directed retirement account. It's a program intended to make sure that everyone in your life has protection against poverty in your retirement. So it consists of: i) your retirement benefit; ii) a lifetime disability insurance product; iii) a spousal benefit product; iv) a minor child disability product; and v) a surviving minor child benefit. You don't get to just disaggregate them.

So it's a mistake to look at 100% of your social security payments and treat them as if they are just funding i) on that list above. They're not. Add in the tax advantages (at least 15% of your social security income is always tax free), and you'd have a hard time duplicating that package if all of your funds were in a private investment account with 100% risk-free assets.


Thank you for saying more completely and coherently what I have said a number of times over on the old place. If an insurance company were to put all those benefits into one product, can you imagine how much it would charge?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds