Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: I saw this coming
Date: 01/10/26 11:01 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Sano again raises straw men.

If the issue is whether or not LEO Ross violated ICE policy or procedure concerning appropriate use of firearms, and it turns out he did not, his employer (ICE) has the prerogative to impose some form of disciplinary action perhaps up to and including termination and loss of benefits.

That's fine, feel free to argue about that all day long if you please.

But that's not the same issue as whether or not the LEO's conduct was criminal.

Which issue are you actually trying to discuss?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds