Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48481 
Subject: Re: "blatantly" unconstitutional
Date: 01/23/2025 4:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
So the judge castigating the lawyer wasn't really appropriate.

Sure he was. Just because a client tells you to make a stupid argument in court doesn't mean the judge can't (or shouldn't) properly identify it as a stupid argument. The "bar member" comment was a way of signaling to the lawyer that this argument was real close to the line where the duty of candor to the tribunal would prohibit standing in open court and saying the rule is constitutional.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds