Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (65) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86252 
Subject: Re: JediPunishment France
Date: 09/30/26 3:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Now let's consider the beating the other brackets take. Those 5/6/8/9 bracket raises of yours? Guess who they nail. Small business owners! The ones who are sole proprietors or other pass-through entities who taxes flow right to their individual 1040s. Up their rates by that much and you can say good-bye to your favorite restaurant in many cases because their margins can't handle it.

And so goes the ripple effects because we don't want to even consider the possibility of any kind of reform
.

And who takes the beating if you slash Social Security and Medicare by 20%? The entire medical and health care sector, for starters - obviously. But also all the small business owners who provide services to that sector and all the ones who have elderly folks among their clientele.

And so goes the ripple effects because we don't want to even consider the possibility of any kind of tax increase.

But....that's not really this discussion, right? No one's refusing to consider the possibility of some kind of reform. We both agree that something will need to be done soon. No one disagreed that this is a problem and something will need to be done about it. In fact, none of this is a surprise to anyone - when the TCHA was being considered in 2017, most analysts pointed out that passing it would blow up the budget deficit and cause a major fiscal fustercluck. To which the GOP said, "no, it will pay for itself and deficits won't materialize, because economic growth will skyrocket and the tax cuts will pay for themselves and all those analysts are just people who are biased against Trump." So now the massive deficits have materialized, the GOP counterarguments were wrong...and we find ourselves here. So of course we need to reform either our spending or our tax provisions.

What we're talking about is which kind of reform is more likely, given the politics of it all. Since Medicare and Social Security are immensely popular and longstanding and benefit the sort of people who are most likely to vote, and since the GOP has moved substantially away from trying to shrink popular government programs and more towards populism, I'm guessing that we end up with raising taxes rather than cutting Medicare and Social Security.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (65) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community