Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: Lambo 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75968 
Subject: SNAP
Date: 10/30/25 5:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Bwa haha haha haha! !

In court filings, submitted late Wednesday, the Trump administration reaffirmed its opposition to provisioning the funds absent a broader spending deal in Congress. Lawyers for the Justice Department acknowledged that an interruption to food stamps would create a “difficult situation for millions of Americans,” but they insisted the court did not have the ability to prevent it.

Officials told the court that the law did not allow them to transfer or spend money that Congress had not appropriated, or in ways that lawmakers did not intend. That, they said, precluded many of the avenues that states have suggested for funding SNAP during the shutdown.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds