Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86278 
Subject: Re: They need a new clean CR
Date: 11/07/25 3:11 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
King Schumer hasn't ever said he would consider re-opening the government for anything less than the $1.5 trillion in goodies he wants added to the C.R.

Maybe not, but there's no way he'd be able to turn down a win if the GOP buckles and redoes the CR with all the ACA subsidies extended.

It doesn't make any sense. Even if you want to believe that Chuck Schumer is evil right down to his cold black heart, which pumps not blood like yours and mine, but rather a thick, vomitous oil - it's just terrible politics to keep the government shut down forever no matter what you're given.

He's not going to do that. He's not going to want to do that. He wants to get a win that he can proclaim to the mountaintops, not an unending stalemate. If he refuses to ever take a win, he'll never get a win.

And he isn't a "King" over the other Democratic Senators. Right now, their hanging together because it looks like they might actually get a tangible win out of all of this - they might genuinely get the subsidies restored because of their strategy. But if the plan is actually, "we shutting down the government for a year and not accepting any yes for an answer," then he'll lose at least a dozen Senators and they'll just vote for the CR that has the ACA subsidies in it over his objections.

But it won't come to that. If they're able to force the subsidies into a new CR for a long enough period of time (they won't accept a day-long extension, won't refuse a decade-long extension, will land somewhere in between), the Democrats will say "yes" any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community