Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86269 
Subject: Re: More EU views on the trade deal
Date: 07/29/25 8:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
It shows that even the face of imminent national need...they can't act decisively.

It's not imminent national need. The situation with Russia isn't on their border, and actually hasn't gone up to even a NATO border. As long as the U.S. is a member of NATO, there is no imminent direct threat to Germany's territorial integrity. If Russia had crossed into a NATO country, you would see a different threat profile - and a different reaction from Germany. As it is, it is still peacetime in the interior of the NATO area, and so all parties involved have been appropriately pursuing their defense strategy on that basis.

They're not at war. They're not on a war-time footing, and don't need to be at this stage. I'm not sure why your expectations are so far out of line with what the situation actually calls for, but this isn't an emergency for Germany. They have to do things, yes - and they have vulnerabilities and weaknesses due to their economic reliance on Russian energy, just as we have with our reliance on foreign chips and rare earths and the like. But they're not facing "imminent national need," and they're acting pretty decisively - as your observation about their huge tank order and their volte face on clean energy (telling the Greens to shove it) demonstrates.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community