Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: knighttof3   😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Chinese ADRs
Date: 04/20/25 2:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
There has been sporadic talk of the US government forcing delisting of Chinese stocks from US exchanges. To keep this non-political, it doesn't matter why or whether that's good or bad for US investors.

My question is, is it safe to assume that China-focused ETFs like FLCH (Franklin Templeton' China ETF), or the broader international ETFs like VXUS, hold the Hong Kong-listed versions if they list their holdings as numbers? Eg 9988 for Alibaba instead of BABA or BABAF.
Same question but with much less urgency, about other non-US stocks available as individual ADRs to US investors. Eg ROG for Roche instead of RHHBY or ambiguous ones like SHEL (same ticker on London and New York stock exchanges).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds