Post #115 by knighttof3 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1)

Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

There has been sporadic talk of the US government forcing delisting of Chinese stocks from US exchanges. To keep this non-political, it doesn't matter why or whether that's good or bad for US investors.

My question is, is it safe to assume that China-focused ETFs like FLCH (Franklin Templeton' China ETF), or the broader international ETFs like VXUS, hold the Hong Kong-listed versions if they list their holdings as numbers? Eg 9988 for Alibaba instead of BABA or BABAF.
Same question but with much less urgency, about other non-US stocks available as individual ADRs to US investors. Eg ROG for Roche instead of RHHBY or ambiguous ones like SHEL (same ticker on London and New York stock exchanges).

Print the post

Post New

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.