Post #36036 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Simply not true.

Simply 100% accurate. Your adopted party has zero interest in giving anything but lip service to border security. They feel that any increase in the minority population is an automatic vote for them and as such they do what they do.

How'd that work out for them last time? Turns out that respect for the law, our borders and national security is one of those pesky subjects that cuts across demographic lines.

You think Stephen Miller would go for a program like Mike outlined?

A guest worker plan, where we give out "Guest worker" and taxpayer IDs to people? Where we know who they are, where they live, where they're working and how long they're going to be here?

Yes he would.

But you're asking the wrong question. Would Chuck Schumer go for that in a standalone bill?

No he wouldn't. Not a chance in hell.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.