Is the same true of Uncommitted, then? Did they prefer Donald Trump? Or did they seek to use withholding of support to try to get Harris to move towards them and then win the seat?

As offered before, given the amount of Israeli money lining the pockets of both Biden and Harris, the Muslim voters of Michigan may well have decided that those two, and Trump, were all equally bad.

By questioning Israel's policies and by pushing back against actions or rhetoric that make conditions more dangerous for Jews, including Jews that both question Israel's policies and want Israel to continue to exist as a Jewish state. Which is probably most Democratic Jews.

As posted earlier, Andy Levin was advocating along those lines. AIPAC spent millions campaigning against him, to put Stevens in the seat instead.

Who said this?

“It is very clear that Mr. Netanyahu has not made us safer, has not brought us closer to peace, and he is a danger to Jews in America and around the world,”

Who said it? Piker? El-Sayed? Jeremiah Wright?

Nope. Haley Stevens, the one that AIPAC spent $30M on, campaigning against El-Sayed.

When she, an Israeli asset, said Israeli policy put American Jews in danger of blowback, it was a nothingburger. When Piker says the same thing, the Israeli assets in the Democratic party turn the outrage up to 11, to bury El-Sayed.

Here's the link:

Haley Stevens takes aim at Netanyahu in Michigan Senate debate, as opponent Abdul El-Sayed calls Israel a ‘rogue state’

jta.org - Haley stevens takes aim at netanyahu in michigan senate debate as opponent abdul el sayed calls israel a rogue

Steve