Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75959 
Subject: Re: Seizing Elections
Date: 02/03/26 12:42 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
So GOP officials mostly ignore what he says until it becomes an actual thing (even then they won't do much, because their voters mostly don't want their officials to challenge the President).

And replying to my own post - I was wrong. Thune thought it was worth addressing, and he came out and said "no chance" -

“I’m supportive of only citizens voting and showing ID at polling places. I think that makes sense. … But I’m not in favor of federalizing elections, no. I think that’s a constitutional issue,” Thune told reporters.

“I’m a big believer in decentralized and distributed power. And I think it’s harder to hack 50 election systems than it is to hack one. In my view, at least, that’s always a system that has worked pretty well,” he said of the benefits of empowering states to run federal elections.


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5720386-thune-...

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds