Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |
Author: Lambo ⎊🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 41593 
Subject: Re: Inheriting a far more dangerous world
Date: 09/24/2024 5:54 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
BHMBagram's importance was not in defending Kabul or the Embassy. Bagram was a strategic asset that should have been retained due to its proximity to China coupled with runways that could accommodate B-52s.


Staying at Bagram to continue counterterrorism operations there would also not have been advisable, Austin said.

"[That] meant staying at war in Afghanistan, something that the president made clear that he would not do," Austin said.

ME: We're in the age of drones now Mike. Listen to the military.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds