Post #2095 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

But such an AI panel would have that social context to draw on since it would have been fed with the content of the entire internet!

As an algorithm processes the internet, can it confirm that which is fact vs that which is fiction?

Could not the algorithm be tweaked such that it gives greater weight to a concept with greater volume or frequency?

To wit, a news story on Fox may typically get, hypothetical only, 50k hair on fire responses to a story. The same story on Politico may only generate 500 ho hum responses. Now the algorithm is tasked with weighting 50k emphatic statements to 500 dismissive responses that assign little import to the topic, whatever it may be.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.