No. of Recommendations: 3
Smaller steps? Is that equivalent to your old orange rapist lying, ranting and raving like a fascist lunatic?
The amount of brainwashing that has taken place by the various board authors here is incredible. You have been caught and played like a fiddle and responding exactly how the military PR wants.
Donald Trump was an awful US president. But do you realise that he is awful for reasons other than what you are discussing, and that every US president, past and present, and including the recent ones such as Obama, have all been equally as dreadful also?
I'm sorry to report that you are lied to each day, from the top down. It starts with the official statements by the military spokespeople, the media obey, and Britain picks up the narratives and exaggerates it 3-fold which we then read as more legitimate. And everyone follows the party line and belief system inadvertently. China is an enemy that has to be stopped, Russia wants to invade Europe.
The myopic focus on on this board with magazine gazette topics related to our presidents is pretty ridiculous. Do you realise that you are being brainwashed to concentrate on petty subjects as who some US president is sleeping with or had oral sex with, or twitter statements by Trump, so as to ignore the far, far, far, far more significant crimes? There far more significant crimes that they are committing are not even discussed, and ^never were^ discussed. Including right now. But firstly let's go back..
If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged. Truman was horrific. Are you guys aware that we bombed North Korea to smithereens and once the military targets were destroyed, we had more bombs so why not use them and we bombed all the dams. Luckily for the North Koreans, Russia and China responded with humanitarian aid yet the population was devastated with mass starvation. North Korean grandparents there today could, as recent as a few years ago, still hear our B52 doing needless laps around North Korea whilst having their own living memory of the awful bombings we did in the 1950s. And we run smear campaign propaganda to make the place look crazy, but you realise the place is isolated because of our ludicrous sanctions and political suffocations threatening anyone who cooperates with them - there than it being their own international policy to want to be isolated, as our narrative feeds us. Good on their leadership for standing up for their public. Move onto Eisenhower - starting with overthrowing of the government of Guatemala, then a capitalist democracy. The overthrow of their government alone is a major crime with the CIA-backed army, and then bombing the place after, plus the invasion of Lebanon in 1958 with a lot of people were killed, plus the overthrow of the government of Iran through another CIA-backed coup. But Guatemala alone is enough for Eisenhower to be hanged by the standard of the Nuremberg laws. For Kennedy, the invasion of Cuba was outright aggression, followed by a huge terrorist campaign against Cuba - bombardment of industrial installations with killing of many, bombing hotels, sinking fishing boats. Then under Nixon, poisoning livestock in Cuba, invaded South Vietnam in 1962, sent our Air Force to start bombing there. Johnson would be hanged for the Indochina war alone, not even mentioning the invasion of the Dominican Republic, another a major war crime. Nixon invaded Cambodia, bombing in the early 1970s was along the same lines as the Khmer Rouge atrocities. Returning to the next present - Ford was only around as president for a very short time but still long enough to be hanged for supporting the Indonesian invasion of East Timor, which makes Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait look trivially small. Reagan supported the Israeli invasion of Lebanon that also makes Saddam Hussein look tame. Bush is so obvious we don't need to go on. Obama was one of the most horrific criminals. He embraced the US drone programme overseeing more strikes in his first year than Bush carried out during his entire presidency. A total of 563 strikes, largely by drones, targeted Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama's two terms, compared to 57 strikes under Bush. Between 384 and 807 civilians were killed in those countries. Trump pulled out of important peace treaties and made the world exceedingly more dangerous. The Trump administration has waged an assault on international law unparalleled in the post-war era. It has embraced what has sometimes been called the "new sovereigntist" critique of international law. Trump withdrew from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty and it was hardly discussed in our media but about the most deadly thing any US president could do - we will see the direct results later. Biden supported the war in Serbia, Syria, Libya, but was always super-aggressive towards Russia. Whilst in power in pushed NATO further into Ukraine, doing all he could to provoke a conflict given the clear and repeated warnings from the Russian administration that it was a red line, a message that started in the early 1990s when Gorbachev was promised that NATO would not move at all to the East from Germany, and of course Ukraine would be a neutral territory. So straight away NATO immediately started expanding to the east. The UN reported 14,000 Ukrainian deaths from terrorist using NATO weaponry after the 2014 coup in Kiev, with Ukraine absolutely not sovereign from 2014 until the present, but following our mandates. Our diplomats were caught on recorded tape selecting the right Ukraine leader - Yanukovych who by contras was the legitimate president 2010-2014, but too independent and so putting the people of Ukraine first, trading with both Russia and Europe - that is absolutely unacceptable so we got rid of him in 2014 with a sponsored violent overthrow.
You are being lied to - horrifically - and reading this board, I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry. If you discussions of who Trump is raping has any importance then you are successfully brainwashed. Sure, he is is dreadful, but the problem isn't what the press is controlling you to discuss, but the things that the press isn't discussing.
In summary is almost no distinction between the main candidates as far as the significant crimes are concerned. If a peaceful president threatens to come, the smear PR tactics are hysterically launched and you will discuss on this board these hysterics, and he'll be out in no time. And another horrific criminal will be in, with crimes not discussed on CNN, read on Bloomberg or the New York Times, the really huge crimes that you guys will again be oblivious to.
