Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: Iran - The Difference in Assessment
Date: 03/13/26 4:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
And now she, of course, would never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb. And now someone actually made that virtually impossible after this operation. I truly don't understand why Democrats can't even acknowledge that this has made the world more safe and more secure, you know, not just all of us, but not just especially the region as well, too.

Fetterman's just operating off a false premise.

How has this made it virtually impossible for Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb? They're in not much of a different position now than they were a few months ago, after we had completely destroyed ("obliterated") their then-existing nuclear facilities. They're not under any different economic sanctions going forward. They're not under any different technological controls than they were going forward. They don't have any greater impediments to obtaining centrifuge or other nuclear technology going forward.

So if they posed a danger to restart and rebuild their nuclear program before we went in two weeks ago, why will they pose any less of a danger to restart and rebuild their nuclear program once we stop actually bombing them?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds