Post #36073 by ptheland on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

If Trump switched to preemptive pardons wouldn't that render moot these judges refusals?

I suppose so. But I doubt Trump cares all that much. After all, it appears that he couldn't be bothered to spend the time sorting the violent from the non-violent J6'ers.

In practice, his DOJ is not going to pursue these cases. So it's 4 years at a minimum before any of the cases could be picked back up. That puts any prosecutions 8 years from the event. The statute of limitations is going to come into play at some point.

The point of my post is showing that people who care about the truth are standing up to the lies that Trump is spreading. And not just some randos, but US District court judges. That is an important thing to do.

--Peter

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.