Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75971 
Subject: Re: Kathryn Ruemmler & her boss in Epstein Emails
Date: 11/13/25 11:08 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Steve, to be fair, in order to determine whether or not you are "right" or "wrong" about a particular topic, you need to make a specific factual assertion that is somehow capable of being framed as a testable hypothesis.

I mean it's like the JFK thing. You can believe whatever you want, and you might even be correct, but saying "what if I am correct?" isn't a persuasive way of making your point.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds