Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86278 
Subject: Re: impractical promises?
Date: 12/22/25 10:11 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Every other OECD country has universal government run healthcare. They all have lower costs and most of them have better outcomes. I don’t think any other proof is necessary that Medicare for All is possible.

Yes, you need other proof.

All of those countries have universal government run healthcare. None of them has tried to convert from a private health care system that has grown to 18% of GDP into a universal government run health care system.

Path dependence is a real thing. Having allowed our health care sector to grow to the current size, with decades of decisions based upon having a private system, it is no longer possible to switch. You would inflict too much economic harm on too many people for it to be politically feasible. You can't switch over unless you either: i) adopt levels of coverage lower than the typical large group employer plan; or ii) slash provider compensation; or iii) have massive, broad based increases in the amount that most people pay for health care either in premiums or taxes. All of those are political non-starters. The idea of single-payer health care might be popular, but because of where we are, the path to get there requires doing some very unpopular things. Which is why Vermont and California and other sapphire-blue states with progressive leadership have failed to make it happen.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community