Post #10482 by Boater on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

"If Trump lost his eligibility to hold office by engaging in an insurrection, the fact that millions of people might want to vote for him anyway doesn't change his lack of eligibility. And it doesn't disenfranchise them to rule that an ineligible candidate can't appear on the ballot."

True, but that isn't the case here. As you point out people ca n still vote for him via write in votes for example, so he has not been determined to be ineligible for the office. Four unknown and unelected judges in Colorado have made it more difficult for people to vote for an eligible individual for office based on ...their... preferences.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.