Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Re: No clue
Date: 11/03/25 11:42 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
You didn't read what I said previously--there is no "evidence" "testimonial or otherwise."

An unsworn hearsay statement to the NY Times is not "evidence."

Testimony before Congress, under oath, is "evidence."


Authenticated documentation consisting of official government records is "evidence."


A senile old man's alibiing to the NY Times is not "evidence." Especially since a special prosecutor determined Biden's ability to recall is so defective that he should not be prosecuted, even though there was probably cause to have indicted Biden for crimes committed while he was Vice President regarding unlawful retention of government records and classified information.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds