Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48466 
Subject: Huge 5th Circuit Ruling
Date: 10/25/2024 7:21 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
It's unconstitutional to count votes received after Election Day.

In sane times, there would be neither conflict nor confusion over this Very. Simple. Concept.

But we don't live in sane time, and we don't have a sane democrat party, do we?

https://www.scribd.com/document/784316641/5th-Circ...

Congress statutorily designated a singular “day for the election” ofmembers of Congress and the appointment of presidential electors. Text,precedent, and historical practice confirm this“day for the election” is theday by which ballots must be bothcast by voters andreceived by state officials.Because Mississippi’s statute allowsballot receipt up to five days after the federal election day, it is preempted by federal law. We reverse the district court’s contrary judgmentand remand for further proceedings.

This is only going to apply to a few states, but the precedent is now there in case it comes up for the Supremes.
Print the post


Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Huge 5th Circuit Ruling
Date: 10/25/2024 7:56 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
It's unconstitutional to count votes received after Election Day.

Quibble - the ruling didn't hold it was unconstitutional to count votes received after Election Day. It held that doing so violated Congressional statute.

In sane times, there would be neither conflict nor confusion over this Very. Simple. Concept.

Why? There's lots of circumstances where we consider the date upon which something has happened as being the date of mailing, rather than the date of receipt. That doctrine is called the "mailbox rule" - we had it drilled into us a lot in first year law school. The opinion alludes to it, but dismisses it out of hand by noting that Congress didn't specify a mailbox rule for when "voting" happens for the purpose of a federal Election Day. But neither did they say it was prohibited - and in a federal pre-emption case, usually you need to find a conflict with what Congress actually said, especially when states are given the right to specify their own rules unless Congress provides otherwise.

If a State wants to say that the date your vote is cast is when you put in the mailbox, just like your tax return is filed the day you put it in the mailbox (and not when it is received), that seems a reasonable construction of the federal Election Day statute - and one that should not be prohibited unless Congress has specifically acted.

Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Huge 5th Circuit Ruling
Date: 10/25/2024 10:34 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
But I guess it's the democrats fault. If Trump Thee Fascist was president, there would be no bird flu.

Agreed. The convict would say there isn't a problem, and then mention bathing them in UV light and injecting bleach.


And I might add Dope that the "mailbox rule" is a Very. Simple. Concept. If you are overseas, the IRS specifies which carriers you can give your tax return to and it is considered filed the day you sent it.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds