Post #76447 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (71)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 11

If only we had a secure place to do big events with the entire line of succession of the US Government present…

Not sure how that's relevant. We have - or had - a secure place to do big events that are hosted by the U.S. Government. The White House has/had facilities like that. But that's public property. Events like the WHCA Dinner aren't held at the White House - they're held on private property. And always will be, because they're events sponsored by a private party.

The issue for the President isn't that the White House grounds aren't adequately secured. It's that the President, of course, has to attend events and functions and meetings that are outside the White House.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (71)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.