Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (105) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86269 
Subject: Re: Trump a vacuous moron
Date: 03/03/25 8:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
And what needs to be first and foremost in anyone's mind is that if you're willing to do what this board wants (The US guarantees their security) then you need to be prepared to go to war with Russia over the Ukraine.

No, you don't. You can have a guarantee that the U.S. will supply them with whatever materiel and resources they need to defend themselves. Smaller countries are frequently able to drive out occupiers and invaders that are much larger than they are as long as they are adequately resourced. We've seen it time and again all around the globe. A force defending their homeland can repel a vastly larger armed force. Heck, that's what we've seen with Ukraine for the last three years - they were perfectly capable of keeping the Russians deadlocked and defending their nation, provided we gave them the resources to do it. These types of proxy wars were more common during the Cold War, when neither the USSR or US wanted to directly engage each other, but still found ways to respond.

That's all you need - you don't need your troops directly engaging the enemy to make it painful for them to invade.

First off, I've noticed that most of (read: 99.9999999999%) of the hostility towards Trump is driven by hypotheticals, such as this one above.

Secondly, Taiwan is of vastly more strategic importance to the US (and the rest of the world) than the Ukraine is. They're not remotely the same situation.


Well, Trump apparently just cut Ukraine off - so clearly he's not all that concerned with making sure Russia pays a price for their invasion.

And Ukraine's strategic importance lies in the global collective security principles that underlie the entire Westphalian system. If you let Russia take a piece out of Ukraine for no reason other than they want it, and they get away with it, then that makes it far more likely that such acquisitions will take place all over the world. Which is the sort of military adventuring that blew up into two full on World Wars, and is vastly more dangerous now that nuclear weapons are in the mix. That was the benefit of the Pax Americana - we ran a massive military and made sure that the world wasn't constantly wracked by military conquest.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (105) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community