Post #27738 by sutton on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 14

I think a clear case can be made to vote against the convict.

The Atlantic today endorsed a presidential candidate for the fifth time in its 150+ year history. The editorial made clear, however that four of those five times were a recommendation against voting for the other candidate:

- In 1860, they recommended voting for Abraham Lincoln.

(104 years of silence followed)

- In 1964, they recommended voting against Barry Goldwater

- In 2016, they recommended voting against DJT

- In 2020, they recommended voting against DJT

- In 2024, they are recommending voting against DJT

Here's to hoping they have another 100 year hiatus ahead*.

-- sutton
*(In a good, First Amendment way, I mean)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.