Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (136) |
Author: jerryab   😊 😞
Number: of 75968 
Subject: Re: January 6, Part Deux
Date: 02/04/26 11:47 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
That wouldn't work. State habeus protections aren't applicable to federal detention.

Deny the federal detention until they produce individual warrants for each ALLEGED "federal" detainee. No warrant = NOT a valid detention and the person is released.

Until the feds fix THEIR problem, nobody is bothered--except the feds. They are not able to keep up NOW--and they are losing fed employees all the time. MORE people chose to leave the DOJ rather than participate in Spankee's criminally fraudulent activities.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (136) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds