Post #21942 by PhoolishPhilip on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 8

“ Other than it violates the UCMJ (look it up) and a small document called the Constitution.”

Does it though? SCOTUS suggests otherwise with its new constitutional immunity clause. Depending on individuals to refuse the direct order of the commander in chief seems to be a thin thread upon which to hang the safety of our democracy. The only sanction against such an “official act” is impeachment.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.