Post #4930 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

I don't buy that Due Process can be so haphazardly set aside as this so called legal scholar opines.

That is a leap on your part as he never opines that.

Assuming the rest of it a correct interpretation, then it seems that Trump would not be disqualified until and unless a court, followed by all the expected appeals, ultimately decides Trump did "participate" in an insurrection or rebellion. That is not a given despite how much Professor Paulson hates Trump.

After the court, but not appeals. His appeal process would be to become qualified again. He's distinguished in humanities so he wouldn't like Trump, but hate is a staple of MAGA folk , bread and butter, makes it easier to anger and manipulate them.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.