Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97) |
Author: Carpian   😊 😞
Number: of 41813 
Subject: Re: Just Three Months Ago
Date: 01/12/2025 11:57 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
What was the reason those considerations did not result in a go decision? Was the scope limited to fire control or the much much larger project of general water supply to citizens and agriculture?

High cost.

Brief summary of the Santa Barbara desalination plant (where I live) here:

https://www.sbck.org/our-work/advocacy/water-suppl....

The City of Santa Barbara constructed a desalination plant in response to the drought of 1986-1991 at a cost of $34 million, but shortly after construction was complete in 1992, the drought ended and the high cost of desalinated water made it economically inviable, so the City promptly decommissioned the plant.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds