Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (83) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86279 
Subject: Re: Hmmmm
Date: 07/31/24 11:48 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Israel should have respected the UN resolution partitioning Palestine for starters. Or they could stop usurping the West Bank, displacing Palestinians from their homes. They could recognize Palestine as a state and give them sovereignty over Gaza at least, including the natural gas fields off the coast valued at 1/2 $trillion. But Zionism does not allow for sharing the land.

Not really an answer, though. Israel doesn't have a time machine, and withdrawing from the West Bank doesn't address how the current fighting in Gaza should end. I could similarly say that Egypt and Jordan should have respected the UN resolution partitioning Palestine, for starters - or that they should have created and recognized Palestine as a state and given them sovereignty over the West Bank and Gaza when they had control of those lands between 1948 and 1967. But just like your comments, that doesn't provide an answer on how the current, active fighting in Gaza should actually be wrapped up.

Should it end with Israel withdrawing troops and allowing Hamas to remain in power and hold the hostages? Should it end with Hamas surrendering their forces and leadership and facing justice for their actions on 10/7? Some combination of both?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (83) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community