Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |
Author: Steve203 ⎊❂🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86257 
Subject: Re: fetal personhood
Date: 09/14/26 1:42 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Specifically, religious beliefs that one ineluctable purpose of sex is to procreate - so that engaging in sex while deliberately preventing the possibility of conception is a moral violation. It violates what they believe is G-d's command to "be fruitful and multiply."

"Rhythm method" prevents procreation, without chemical or physical barriers. Is it "artificial"? What is the difference between rhythm and abstinence? Abstinence is a conscious decision to avoid procreation. Anything that prevents procreation is against "God's will".

How long have politics and religion been intertwined? Since about forever. Traditionally, the crown has also been "defender/protector of the faith". In return, the religion supports the crown, with the "divine right of kings" narrative. What does the crown want? More money and power. How does the crown obtain more money and power? 1-more workers to make more stuff, that the crown owns. 2-more soldiers to fight the crown's wars to take wealth and power from others, for the benefit of the crown. The crown wants it's Proles to breed like rabbits, because more Proles result in more wealth and power for the crown, so the religion the crown "protects/defends" adjusts it's doctrine to support what the crown wants, lest it be replaced by "new religion" that does give the crown what it wants (see Henry VIII). Then the people bow down to the crown's religion, lest they be burned at the stake for heresy. (see the religious kangaroo court the English crown arranged to get rid of Joan)

From the net sifter:

Yes — the Spanish Inquisition was not an independent papal institution; it was created and operated under the direct authority of the Spanish Crown.

When Pope Sixtus IV granted permission in 1478 to establish the Inquisition in Spain, it was done at the request of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile, the Catholic Monarchs who had just unified their kingdoms. Unlike the medieval papal Inquisition, which was controlled by the Church, the Spanish Inquisition was a hybrid religious–secular body. The Crown appointed its inquisitors, oversaw its operations, and could replace or remove officials


Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community