Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48486 
Subject: Re: Panama Canal ports...
Date: 03/04/2025 7:16 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
I sure don't like that word "majority". It seems quite risky to have even a few Chicoms with hands on involvement in canal operations. Their mere presence allows China to keep track of US Navy movements through the canal. In addition to espionage, having insiders facilitates acts of sabotage during wartime too.

At least this way you have an excuse to have people running around the port ID'ing who might be reporting back to Beijing. And BlackRock can make decisions absent 100% influence from the CCP.

Either way, it's a very positive development.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds