No. of Recommendations: 3
You realize that making assertions is /= to stating facts, right? And that "debating" assertions is the cornerstone of a solid discussion, right?
The assertion should be based on something, and preferably a fact. An assertion shown to be based on facts or history, beats an unsupported assertion. correct?
If one side presents evidence that their opponents assertions are very likely to be incorrect, and the other side does nothing to support their assertion other than to make innuendos or more assertions, the position is weak and unsupportable, correct?
If someone avoids supporting an assertion, however they avoid it, it indicates a weak unsupportable position, right?
