Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (105) |
Author: Dope1 ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 86277 
Subject: Re: Trump a vacuous moron
Date: 03/03/25 8:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
It could be - I don't think anyone has said that NATO membership is the only way to guarantee Ukraine's security. There are many reasons why it's both a good and bad idea, but it's not the only solution.

Indeed. Hence the economic framework as a starting point.

But that's part of why Trump's come under so much criticism from Ukraine's defenders. The essential element of a Taiwan-like solution (apart from memorializing it in a treaty) is unwavering public commitment to the security policy. You have to make sure that the other side holds no misconceptions about the willingness and capability to defend the smaller country.

And what needs to be first and foremost in anyone's mind is that if you're willing to do what this board wants (The US guarantees their security) then you need to be prepared to go to war with Russia over the Ukraine.

That's what a "security guarantee" means. So far, not a single board member has been willing to station large numbers of troops there. Fine, maybe we don't need to do that. But is the Ukraine going to be the thing you would start World War III over?

I'd argue that no, it shouldn't be. All you folks pushing for this should think carefully about what you would commit the US to. If your answer is "Europe should do it", then the counter to that is, "With what?"

if Trump is willing to let Russia get all of its war aims in Ukraine despite being the unprovoked aggressor, Russia's certainly not going to regard the U.S. as a likely defender of Ukraine if they decide to eat the rest of it down the road. And that ratchets up the danger for Taiwan as well; if the U.S. is willing to live with just token consequences for Russia attacking and seizing sovereign territory in their sphere of influence, China may conclude that the same is on offer in Taiwan.

First off, I've noticed that most of (read: 99.9999999999%) of the hostility towards Trump is driven by hypotheticals, such as this one above.

Secondly, Taiwan is of vastly more strategic importance to the US (and the rest of the world) than the Ukraine is. They're not remotely the same situation.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (105) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community