Post #7768 by WatchingTheHerd on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

I think the larger point is that impeachment is solely a parliamentary processs for solving political debates about one's suitability to make and enforce laws that has nothing to do with one's criminal or civil exposure TO those laws. Anyone with basic familiarity with how different the procedural processes and rules of evidence are between an impeachment trial and a criminal trial would never confuse the two or assume their outcomes are linked (positively or negatively). They have no bearing on each other. Hopefully, both Judge Chutkan and any judges up the chain involved with the inevitable appeals see this for what it is and quickly dispatch it to the trash can in unambiguous language for future reference.

WTH

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.