Post #3361 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (52)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

The point is that is has not and issuing a warning is simply a convenient way to attack a popular conservative. If such warnings were necessary and sincere, he would be issuing one for Chicago but he hasn't. Why?

I imagine it's because such warnings are issued more for the purpose of attacking conservative policies, not necessarily a conservative politician. The NAACP was incensed by the changes to Florida's educational policies, and the warning was a dramatic - though logically questionable - way of highlighting that opposition.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (52)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.