No. of Recommendations: 2
This is why most of us don't bother discussing things with you any longer. You consistently misrepresent what others say to you. Then you persist is claiming you are right in your interpretation even after is it explained to you why you are wrong.
Fail.
Regardless, it doesn't matter whether you agree with my position on that law or not - under your interpretation of the law, it would be a crime not just for Waltz and Hegseth to send classified or national security information on Signal, but for Rubio and Wiles and everyone else to receive it.
That's al upthread attempting to use my arguments against me. He's the one saying "it would be a crime"...and that includes the reporter.
Try again. Or show me your belly again. You pick.
So I'm not going to discuss this with you
Oh noes! You're merely lib #235 who would rather make this about me than about the issues.
