Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 41628 
Subject: Re: Sane-Washing Trump Incoherence
Date: 09/10/2024 4:49 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
That she is not a convict felon, nor an adjudicated rapist, nor suffering dementia, and is not incredibly stupid does not shed any light on if she has any idea at all about how to solve many of the problems facing our country.

Well, listening to the convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, demented, and stupid candidate doesn't give me the impression that he has any idea at all about anything, let alone complex problems. He makes sure we know he's clueless every time he opens his mouth.

Question posed: How would you deal with child care?
Answer: several minute ramble that makes absolutely no sense at all, but did include the words "child care" a couple of times, along with the word "numbers".

The only topic on which he seems to be able to compose a coherent sentence is the 2020 election, which he often claims was stolen from him.

Which brings up another topic. You have asked multiple times, Michael, for your opponents to talk about Harris' position on a variety of topics. And you get answers. How about you address your candidate's position on a topic that many consider important? Here's a couple I'd like to know more about. Pick any one you'd like.

-His criminal conviction in New York, specifically why that conviction isn't disqualifying for a presidential candidate.
-Or his other open criminal cases, Georgia, DC federal court, FL federal court. Why aren't those disqualifying?
-How about his position on the 2020 election. He has claimed on a great many occasions that the election was stolen from him. Yet he cannot provide any evidence of that which has stood up to scrutiny in court? Why does he persist in his claims despite the lack of evidence?

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds