Post #22032 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

>>I am ashamed to admit that I must not be among the smarter and better informed MAGA's. So as I strive for enlightenment, could you explain the mechanics of how getting rid of the National Weather Service can be monetized for their own personal gain?<<

The head of AccuWeather, a heavy contributor to Republicans, got several to propose a bill to privatize all weather service, (never mind that he already made a handsome living from it). - GH

================

So Trumps paths to personal enrichment is that one of his contributors will gain additional wealth and in a position to donate even greater amounts to Trump.

Thank you for that answer although it seems the dependency on contributions is rather indirect and weak. After all, when Trump becomes a dictator he no longer needs campaigns and hence campaign donors.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.