Post #36799 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (216)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

He's got it backwards, anyway. The burden of proof is on him to produce evidence that permission was given, and then -apparently- rescinded. We know there was no permission to land, because they weren't allowed to land. As was the right of the Colombian government. Was there ever permission? The burden on him is to prove there was. It's a Russell's Teapot scenario. There may be a teapot orbiting Saturn, but it's on the one making the affirmative claim to prove it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (216)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.