Post #62552 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (102)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

Most latinos and myself don't want large amounts of people trying to get in. We don't want to find out that they're advertising in China, or Yemen that you can walk across the border and apply for asylum in the USA and they'll get you there for $xxxxx.

Sure. But, as albaby argued with Dope, the data show that something like 60% (if memory serves) of asylum-seekers were approved. That's without counsel. They stood in front of a judge and made their case without a lawyer, and it was accepted. So I think your characterization is a little unfair. Not completely inaccurate. Just that a lot of those people were adjudicated to have legitimate claims.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (102)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.