Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (115) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75971 
Subject: Re: Birthright citizenship
Date: 12/15/25 12:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
The Supreme Court, as you admitted, simply declined to hear an appeal of a lower court ruling on the so called shadow docket.

There was no ruling by the court as to any of the merits of the underlying case. It's the shadow docket.

Not only is there no binding holding in the Supreme Court which says what you falsely attributes to it, there is no binding or precedential holding in the Supreme Court at all.

You're a liar. When your mistake is pointed out to you, rather than conceding your mistake, you double down.

Typical lying Leftist

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (115) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds