Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 75963 
Subject: Re: No going back?
Date: 01/21/26 6:16 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
We’re in an environment where there’s not a huge constituency for a restorationist president,

But there may be a big constituency for a President who can use her new powers to force some new restraints onto the office - not voluntary ones but ones written into law and possibly constitutional amendments.

Just as a potential example:
Some specific constraints based on the emoluments clause.

—Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds