Post #49734 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (45)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Since Bill Clinton was a regular guest of Epstein and has a history of sexual exploits
you must be talking about him.

They're pathetically desperate as usual.

So the WSJ drops a supposed bomb that contains...literally nothing. No pictures of this supposed thing, no analysis, nothing. They even admit they have no idea that it came from Trump or not.

And yet our usual suspects are all a-gaga over this despite ignoring for years the entirety of the Epstein thing (and, as you point out, Bill Clinton's involvement).

No matter. Pretty soon we're going to see the national spectacle of Barack Obama trying to claim executive privilege from testifying. I hope Trump extracts quite a bit from him in exchange for granting it.

Like giving up all of his henchmen.

And the cherry on top? Trump pardoning Obama. How awesome would that be?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (45)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.