Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Post New
Author: commonone 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48474 
Subject: Well, What a Coincidence
Date: 01/02/2024 2:11 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
Coincidentally, as this board discusses voter fraud, in a piece in USA Today this morning the man whose company the Trump campaign hired to prove voter fraud in the 2020 election said it found none, "no evidence of large-scale voter fraud based on data mining and fraud analytics" and, in fact, his company found that the "claims of voter fraud made by others were verified as false, including proof of why those claims were disproven."

Yet despite receiving clear evidence that there was not sufficient voter fraud -- the small amount of voter fraud found was bipartisan, with about as many Republicans casting duplicate votes as Democrats -- to change a single election in any state in the country, Trump, his allies, and his followers continue to deny reality and claim otherwise.

Why?

Because it's a cult sealed inside of a bubble.

It’s part of a steady diet of innuendo, misrepresentations and outright lies when it comes to the issue of voter fraud. Giuliani admitted he lied about Ruby Freeman and her daughter committing election crimes in Georgia. Stories that set the record straight about election innuendo are not typically broadcast in right-leaning media, which means that millions of people receive no information to help them make a more informed decision about what happened in 2020.

What these claims don’t take into account is that voter fraud is detectable, quantifiable and verifiable. I have yet to see anyone offer up "evidence" of voter fraud from the 2020 election that provides these three things.


After nearly three years of looking -- with unlimited financial and personnel resources -- not a single shred of evidence has been brought forward of any voter fraud that stole the election from Orange Jesus.

SAD!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2024/01/02/...
Print the post


Author: ges 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48474 
Subject: Re: Well, What a Coincidence
Date: 01/02/2024 5:36 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Coincidentally, as this board discusses voter fraud, in a piece in USA Today this morning the man whose company the Trump campaign hired to prove voter fraud in the 2020 election said it found none, "no evidence of large-scale voter fraud based on data mining and fraud analytics" and, in fact, his company found that the "claims of voter fraud made by others were verified as false, including proof of why those claims were disproven."

So, now, as we are seeing, the poor 'victimized' right must make up a lie about the rules not being fair. Garbage. The rules applied fairly to all. Ugh, so much victimhood and pathetic whining.
Print the post


Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48474 
Subject: Re: Well, What a Coincidence
Date: 01/03/2024 11:55 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
From a hyperlink in the USAToday story: "Ken Block, the founder of Simpatico Software Systems, said he was subpoenaed to turn over documents related to his work with the Trump campaign.

The firm was the second one hired by the campaign that reported it found no widespread evidence of voter fraud.


Any idea which company was hired first by the Trump campaign?

Apparently, despite 2 companies reporting similar results, Trump chose to rely on his ample gut, lying to MAGAcult to preserve his power.

And now the GOP pols are grabbing their ankles lining up in an orange daisy chain for a delusional rapist who uses television reality show ratings as his model for managing a nation.
Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48474 
Subject: Re: Well, What a Coincidence
Date: 01/03/2024 1:26 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Sano: Any idea which company was hired first by the Trump campaign?

"Former president Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign commissioned an outside research firm in a bid to prove electoral-fraud claims but never released the findings because the firm disputed many of his theories and could not offer any proof that he was the rightful winner of the election, according to four people familiar with the matter.


The campaign paid researchers from Berkeley Research Group, the people said, to study 2020 election results in six states, looking for fraud and irregularities to highlight in public and in the courts. Among the areas examined were voter machine malfunctions, instances of dead people voting and any evidence that could help Trump show he won, the people said. None of the findings were presented to the public or in court.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/02/11...
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds