Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Post New
Author: commonone 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48467 
Subject: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/08/2024 3:45 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
So, how did Trump post bond for E. Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against him, amid reports that the former president is broke?

Court records filed today show that the bond was guaranteed by the Chubb Corporation, an insurance group. In 2018, Trump appointed Chubb’s CEO Evan Greenberg to a White House advisory committee for trade policy and negotiations.

Chubb is also infamous for talking up Green Energy while insuring a wide range of fossil fuel producers, including Russia.

Chubb is insuring oil and gas extraction and transport in Russia, fueling Russia’s war on Ukraine. In fact, Chubb called Russian oil and gas “one of the most promising activities” of its Russian operations. The insurer was recently backing Nord Stream 2, a massive, controversial natural gas pipeline built by Gazprom, the world’s largest producer of gas and a majority Russian state-owned fossil fuel company (which also happens to be funded by JPMorgan Chase). Following the horrific invasion of Ukraine, RAN joined more than 75 global organizations in sending a letter to Chubb and other financial institutions last week, urging them to end the financing, investing, and insuring of companies in Russia’s coal, oil, and gas industries, and to divest from existing holdings.

Clinton was right: with Trump, all roads lead to Putin.


https://newrepublic.com/post/179685/trump-january-...

https://www.ran.org/the-understory/chubb-is-insuri...

Print the post


Author: weatherman   😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/08/2024 6:02 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
this was the small change warm-up.

"Other terms of the bond, such as how much money or collateral Trump put down, were not disclosed."
well, there needs to be >50% nonrefundable premium to cover future lawsuits to get any back. unless a friend-of-MAGA deal?
seriously, where is the chubb Board? chubb places no negative cost on bad publicity?

AM SWEATING THAT BROOKFIELD AGAIN GETS INVOLVED WITH A TRUMP RELATED BAIL-OUT...PLEASE BRUCE, NO!!!
Print the post


Author: WatchingTheHerd HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 3959 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/08/2024 7:33 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
In 2018, Trump appointed Chubb’s CEO Evan Greenberg to a White House advisory committee for trade policy and negotiations.

Here's a hypothetic to lay on ya, as they say in Texas...

Per that story in The New Republic, the insurer that posted the bond is a subsidiary of Chubb Insurance Group. Did Trump promise Evan Greenberg a cabinet position if elected in exchange for coughing up the promise to pay $93 million if he loses his case and still cannot come up with $93 million on his own? Examining this on a purely transactional basis (the only way the Trump mind operates) would seem to make a pretty good case for that.

* Trump doesn't have $93 million in cash available to pay the judgement outright
* Trump might have an estimated $10 million for a BOND against the $93 million but...
* no other party trusts his evaluations of assets he's willing to promise as collateral
* requiring favor leverage from a different angle to be utilized
* Trump HAS the carrot of future appointments in Trump Administration II to offer to encourage co-signers
* there is still a $554 million dollar shoe waiting to drop in a few weeks
* but Trump has to focus on the first deadline facing him that could divulge his true financial state to live to fight another week

From Greenberg's perspective,

* Chubb is making money by insuring development projects for oil and gas in Russia
* Greenberg was already willing to contribute to Trump charades in his first Administration
* Trump COULD possibly defer payment of civil penalties for another four years IF he wins the Presidency and convinces a pliant Supreme Court of some new rule that Presidents are freed from paying prior civil obligations while President
* If Chubb can continue lining up deals that net BILLIONS in profits dealing with Russia, writing a check for $93 million is just the cost of doing business to earn the billions
* paying Trump's $93 million judgment might be PEANUTS to what Chubb is paying under the table for the privilege of doing business in Putin's Russia
* since Chubb may already be in a ethical twilight zone by doing business in Russia, Chubb's board may have no qualms about its CEO allowing a subsidiary to taken on this $93 million exposure
* if Trump can win and make it to January 20, 2025 and make Greenberg Commerce Secretary, there may be many gifts on Chubb's corporate wish list that Greenberg would be in a position to obtain

Of course, if Democrats retain control of the Senate, cabinet appointments by a re-elected Trump will be placed under an electron microscope and likely blocked at any whiff of prior deals such as this. I'd expect Trump to overlook this possibility. If Greenberg was thinking along the lines above and still entered into this "partnership," he apparently has not considered it either which may prove he is equally corrupt and dumb as Trump.


WTH
Print the post


Author: commonone 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 3959 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/08/2024 7:52 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
WatchingTheHerd: Of course, if Democrats retain control of the Senate, cabinet appointments by a re-elected Trump will be placed under an electron microscope and likely blocked at any whiff of prior deals such as this. I'd expect Trump to overlook this possibility. If Greenberg was thinking along the lines above and still entered into this "partnership," he apparently has not considered it either which may prove he is equally corrupt and dumb as Trump.

Does Ken Cuccinelli ring any bells? Cuccinelli was brought on board by Trump as acting Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security after McConnell made it clear that Cuccinelli would not get confirmed.

More than likely, Trump, who has sidelined the chamber’s role and placed loyalists in these critical positions in the past with the label acting in their titles, would most certainly do so again.

In a second term, there is literally nothing Trump will not destroy to enrich himself, his family, and his cronies.

So that makes the key word in your quoted comment: "corrupt." And as we've seen over and over again, Trump is totally corrupt and he totally corrupts those around him.
Print the post


Author: weatherman   😊 😞
Number: of 3959 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 10:19 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
wish i could track down the source, but one observer noted something along the lines of
'the constitution was never designed to protect from corruption on the level of someone like trump...it was not within the founders' imagination'

the main idea being loopholes and abstract terms were included to allow some leeway to well-intentioned leaders with some level of decency that may make mistakes on behalf of the nation's interests.
but what these loopholes have turned into is political platforms for the legislature and twister for the judiciary.

currently, we are seeing peak pre-election GOP employment jousting for working under trump.
will we see fair-weather fans in congress and SCOTUS, that all deny their past support, if trump loses? don himself would have it no other way.
Print the post


Author: bighairymike   😊 😞
Number: of 3959 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 11:52 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
'the constitution was never designed to protect from corruption on the level of someone like trump...it was not within the founders' imagination' - weatherman

------------------

I agree with you. The founders did not have nearly the imagination of today's liberals.

Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 12:25 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
'the constitution was never designed to protect from corruption on the level of someone like trump...it was not within the founders' imagination' - weatherman

------------------

I agree with you. The founders did not have nearly the imagination of today's liberals.


I disagree. They knew about guys like Trump, demagogues, and the how they appeal to the worst in people. They just didn't imagine the internet, the array of channels we have, twitter, Truth Social...etc

They've been with us for a long time:
“A demagogue must be neither an educated nor an honest man; he must be ignorant and a rogue.”
― Aristophanes

So of course the founders knew, even the businessman founder who is never quoted knew.

SNIP Washington, of course, was not the only framer who viewed our Constitution largely as a bulwark against demagogues. In the surviving records of the speeches given at the Constitutional Convention, the word “demagogue” was used 21 times by the framers as they crafted the Constitution’s essential checks and balances against despotism and tyranny.

“Demagogues are the great pests of our government,” said Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts during the convention, “and have occasioned most of our distresses.” Gerry further described demagogues as “pretended patriots,” unprincipled politicians who steer the people toward “baneful measures” through “false reports.”

James Madison of Virginia twice alluded to “the danger of demagogues.” Alexander Hamilton of New York spoke of this peril of democracy more than any other delegate, naming it seven times. Demagogues, Hamilton said on the floor of Independence Hall in late June 1787, “hate the controul of the Genl. Government.”

Later, Hamilton went on to predict an ominous decline in republics from demagoguery to tyranny. As he put it in Federalist No. 1: “History will teach us that ... of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants.”

Other framers who raised the red flag of demagoguery during the Constitutional Convention were Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania, Pierce Butler of South Carolina, and Edmund Randolph and George Mason of Virginia. Mason declared outright that “the mischievous influence of demagogues” was one of the top two “evils” that can befall republican forms of government.

This destructive risk of demagogues is one reason the 55 framers of the Constitution adopted the power of impeachment during the historic convention of 1787.

They believed uniformly that some men, though elected by the people, would be temperamentally incapable of serving the public interest under the Constitution. Therefore, they offered Congress the remedy of impeachment and removal from office.SNIP

I think many of us don't really know what a demagogue is and allow for different types. Witness all the pro-Trumpers, these are who demagogues play to. I think of Aaron Burr as a demagogue of sorts. He did tie Jefferson for the Presidency and was briefly a VP. But he tried to take Louisiana and make his own little empire. So they had them in their midst also. Every once in a while I realize a historical character was a demagogue and I didn't recognize it. I am a little slow at times. :)

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-12-26/d...
Print the post


Author: g0177325   😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 2:28 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Washington, of course, was not the only framer who viewed our Constitution largely as a bulwark against demagogues.

I might have missed a Washington quote above, in this or another thread, but here's one, from:

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/wa...

But the greatest danger could spring from the chaos of a dysfunctional democracy, compounded by relentless party warfare, which, Washington warned, would erode faith in the effectiveness of self-governance and open the door to a demagogue with authoritarian ambitions. “The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.”(*)

That last bit describes Trump to a "T": self-salvation via the sacrifice of democracy. 😟

(*) The quote is from Washington's farewell address:

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/hi...
Print the post


Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 2:56 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Russia again? Can’t the NPC’s use a little imagination?

Oh, right. That’s why they’re NPC’s.
Print the post


Author: weatherman   😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 10:12 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
some interesting history there...the word 'demagogue' seemed to be all the rage among the muttonchop gang.

regardless, all the flowery pitches against demagoges, or any such word, has not led us into a practical solution for the very situation we face.
we have unsurprising opposing partisan views of what such a word means towards functional action, and even more concrete edicts have fallen short of disambiguity. (among both the balancing congress and judiciary)

i can hardly believe these speeches were meant to be put to some resultant use only once the danger resides in office, as that did not work the first time around.
Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/09/2024 10:44 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3

regardless, all the flowery pitches against demagoges, or any such word, has not led us into a practical solution for the very situation we face.


SNIP They believed uniformly that some men, though elected by the people, would be temperamentally incapable of serving the public interest under the Constitution. Therefore, they offered Congress the remedy of impeachment and removal from office.

The framers did not view the exercise of this remedy to be an anti-democratic act of nullifying elections. To the contrary, they provided the people and their representatives with these emergency powers for the specific purpose of rescuing our democracy and Constitution from harm and destruction at the hands of demagogues.SNIP

Not sure what you mean by speeches, as it clearly indicates that impeachment was the answer once they attained office. That we weren't able to remove him shows the clear problem of bipartisan politics not seemingly anticipated. It's very clear the only real solution is to stop him from taking office by the vote, and many of the red states have a thumb on the Republican side of the vote, and another thumb in the electoral college count, so we have to win by more than we should. But that was the compromise.
Print the post


Author: weatherman   😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: Trump's Latest Russian Connection
Date: 03/11/2024 8:56 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
so it seems chubb may have multiple russian connections, not just that for oil&gas. some via greenberg.
chubb is a slick operator, praised by warren buffet's gang, and possibly a recent investor. part of the bond terms is addition of another 60 days from the appeal loss to delay payment, but chubb is savvy and likely to have it already in hand from the true source of funds.

it is my understanding that carroll can reject this chubb bond, but with obvious further delays as well.

regardless, this is noise compared to the upcoming big fraud bond.
am very curious if it is another foreign frontman, and whether it matters not to the number of layers obscuring the true source of money.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds