Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Re: Read it and weep for America
Date: 11/11/25 12:52 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Wolf had to resign because he's biased and showing a non-judicial temperament.

He's obviously already pre-judged any possible case that might in the future come before him which might somehow involve Trump or Trump administration policies.

It's not especially likely, but let's say there's a civil suit filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts and he gets the case, involving Trump or Trump's policies(although I believe he is on senior status, he may still get an occasional case or two).

Obviously he has already pre-judged any possible case involving the current administration.

The only real question is how long has his anti-Trump bias been affecting his judicial judgment.

Years, decades?

He's very angry because he doesn't want to be a judge, he wants to be an anti-Trump advocate.

By the way, although he was appointed during Reagan's administration, the courtesies of the Senate mean very liberal Senators had a veto power over that nomination. Ted Kennedy, and Tsongas/Kerrey.

So no doubt, Wolf is probably one of the most progressive members of the federal bench.

And it shows,doesn't it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds